Home > Driver Distraction > Driver Distraction Review

Driver Distraction Review

In particular, a number of route guidance systems now ‘lock out’ the destination entry function when the vehicle is in motion (Farber, Foley, & Scott, 2000). A number of studies have examined the interaction between the performance of an in-vehicle non-driving task and the complexity of the driving environment (Brookhuis et al., 1991; Horberry et al., in The authors hypothesised that lower mean speeds were an indication that the system required more of the driver’s attentional capacity, as drivers would drive at slower speeds to compensate for their Horberry et al. (in press), for example, found that the driving performance of drivers aged over 60 years was relatively more degraded when interacting with an entertainment system or a mobile click site

used objects that were not central to the driving task to increase the complexity of the drives, such as billboards and buildings, whereas other research has tended to increase the complexity RECOMMENDED DISTRACTION MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES AND MEASURES In addition to reviewing what is known about both technology and non-technology-based distractions deriving from within the vehicle, the authors reviewed the various scientific techniques Further research is needed on alternative modes of input and output, such as tactile feedback and voice activation, to determine whether these interaction methods are a safe and viable alternative to Rakauskas and colleagues (2004) examined the relationship between level of conversation difficulty and driver distraction using a naturalistic conversation task, whereby participants were required to answer easy and difficult questions (e.g.,

There is a need for research to design the HMI so that it eliminates as far as possible the need for these secondary tasks. Route guidance systems that present navigation instructions using voice output are less distracting and more usable than those systems that present the information on a visual display. Results revealed that drivers in the 25 to 29 year age group had the highest risk of being involved in a fatal or injury crash while using a hand-held phone of

Because many aspects of the driving task become automated with experience, drivers are often capable of dividing their attention between concurrent tasks without any serious consequences to driving performance or safety. The above definition, however, does not take into account other forms of interference that occur when secondary tasks are performed concurrently with the driving task. Horberry et al. A recent study by Shinar and colleagues (2005) examined whether repeated experience conversing on a mobile phone led to a learning effect, whereby drivers became better able to share the phone

Generally, research has found that as the difficulty of the secondary and/or driving tasks increase, the potential for the task to degrade driving performance also increases. Thirty participants (mean age 26.93 years) completed four simulated drives in which they had to deal with incoming calls, using both a hands-free and a hand-held phone. As more wireless communication, entertainment and driver assistance systems proliferate the vehicle market, the incidence of distraction-related crashes is expected to escalate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251312763_Driver_Distraction_A_Review_of_the_Literature Information for Indigenous Australians For full functionality of ResearchGate it is necessary to enable JavaScript.

Research by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) estimates that driver inattention in its various forms contributes to approximately 25 percent of police-reported crashes. Data from the survey was correlated with mobile and driving records and analysed to establish if there is a link between mobile phone use while driving and crashes. Drivers in the youngest group also demonstrated a significant decline in responsiveness to traffic signals when they were engaged in a casual phone conversation. Entertainment Systems Tuning a radio while driving appears to have a detrimental effect on driving performance, particularly for inexperienced drivers.

An Australian study examined for drivers of different ages, the association between distraction inside and outside the vehicle and the risk of being involved in a crash (Lam, 2002). Moreover, the authors observed no safety advantages of using a hands-free over a hand-held phone while driving and concluded that their results did not support the policy being adopted in many There has been relatively less research conducted to examine this question, primarily due to reporting and recording issues, and the research that has been conducted has largely focused on the risks Results revealed that the risk of being involved in a vehicle crash while using a mobile phone was four times greater than that among the same drivers when they were not

It is important, however, that these systems are ergonomically designed to accommodate driver limitations and capabilities and that any negative effects on driving performance that they might induce, such as distraction, get redirected here This information, combined with the epidemiological data from the previously mentioned study being conducted by the University of Western Australia Department of Public health Injury Research Centre, will enable an initial Sixteen participants drove along a track with traffic lights in an instrumented vehicle. To complement the above activities, research is needed to develop a taxonomy of distracting events and objects occurring outside the vehicle.

Several studies have found that smoking while driving increases the risk of being involved in a crash. With regard to mobile phones, there is evidence that the task of having to physically manipulate the phone does negatively affect driving. The overall costs and benefits afforded by various technologies must be assessed before restricting or prohibiting drivers from engaging in distracting tasks while driving. http://omsbl.com/driver-distraction/driver-distraction-conference-2017.html Brown, A.

Rather, research has focused on identifying the particular performance impairments associated with the use of in-vehicle devices. However, as Wickens (2002) states, just because two concurrent tasks utilise different resources does not mean that they will not cause any dual-task interference, particularly if the demands of one or The potential for route guidance systems to distract drivers can occur either when they are entering destination details or responding to guidance instructions.

One interesting aspect of this finding is that neither the test car nor the lead vehicle interacted with the additional vehicles on the road, suggesting that simply increasing the perceptual complexity

Surprisingly, very little research has been conducted to specifically address this issue. It can also impair drivers’ visual search patterns, reaction times, decision-making processes and can increase the risk of being involved in a collision. They manipulated the complexity of the driving environment by increasing the number of billboards and advertisements placed on the roadside and the number of buildings and on-coming traffic. Close News and Events home MUARC NewsMUARC Events Close Contact us home Close Find a course Choose Monash Research Sub menu Research areas Our publications Participate in our research Early career

It is important to recognise, however, that not all changes in driving performance associated with non-driving tasks are indicative of driver impairment, and research suggests that drivers do engage in a Regan, M. This study constituted Phase 1 of a larger project examining the role of distraction in traffic crashes. my review here Where appropriate, the graduated licensing system should be used to restrict driver exposure to distracting activities that are known to compromise safety.

Here are the instructions how to enable JavaScript in your web browser. Route guidance systems with voice recognition technology are a more ergonomic and safer option than systems that require visual-manual entry. Fatal and injury crash data collected by New South Wales police during the years 1996 and 2000 was examined and crashes were categorised as resulting from no distraction, or distraction inside In contrast, the paper map resulted in the lowest mean speeds, the highest workload ratings and the greatest number of navigational errors.

Faulks, M.