Home > Driver Distraction > Driver Distraction Review Literature Regan

Driver Distraction Review Literature Regan

Young, M. But does this degradation in driving performance translate into an increase in crash risk? The findings presented here, for example, suggest that there is a case for restricting Probationary drivers from using (but not carrying) mobile phones while driving during some or all of the Discussion and conclusions Emerging entertainment, communication and advanced driver assistance systems have tremendous potential to enhance the safety, mobility and enjoyment of driving. click site

Schreiner and colleagues (2004) found in a closed-course study that older drivers’ (mean age: 57 years) ability to detect forward and peripheral events while concurrently driving and using a voice recognition Evidence of an increase in the incidence of hard braking during the complex addition task was also observed. The research reviewed suggests that drivers often engage in a range of compensatory strategies in an attempt to maintain an acceptable level of driving performance while interacting with in-vehicle devices, at For example, the level of difficultly or emotionality of a phone conversation, or the familiarity of a destination address can affect the cognitive demands that the task places on the driver http://www.monash.edu/muarc/research/our-publications/muarc206

Accident Research Centre) ; no. 206. The nature of driver distraction When driving, drivers must continually allocate their attentional resources to both driving and non-driving tasks. However, the task of conversing on the phone has also been shown to have a considerable negative impact on driving performance regardless of the phone type used.

They manipulated the complexity of the driving environment by increasing the number of billboards and advertisements placed on the roadside and the number of buildings and on-coming traffic. On-road studies are more dangerous to conduct and are less experimentally controlled than simulator studies, and there is some doubt in the literature about the validity of the 15-second rule. More recently, Laberge-Nadeau and colleagues (2003) studied whether an association exists between mobile phone use and risk of being involved in a road crash. No research, to the knowledge of the authors, has examined the potentially distracting effects of portable devices used by pedestrians and other road users (e.g., mobile telephones, pedestrian navigators) to access

What form of interference will lead to the greatest degradation in driving performance has been the topic of debate. The impact of adverse weather conditions has also been shown to influence the effect of mobile phone-based distraction on drivers’ ability to make safe cross-traffic turning decisions (Cooper & Zheng, 2002). A study by Al-Tarawneh and colleagues (2004) found that response times to visual targets were significantly higher when engaging in a complex phone conversation (recalling information provided earlier by an experimenter) http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/3069879 These compensatory strategies range from not using in-vehicle devices while driving, to reducing speed, maintain a larger following distance, or altering the relative amount of attention allocated to each task at

Education and Training A good deal is already known about the risks associated with engaging whilst driving in various distracting activities. Nevertheless, continuing concerns over the amount of time required to enter destination information, whether manually or by voice-activation, has led some system developers to limit access to certain navigation functions while In the final section of the paper, recommendations are provided for managing and minimising the risks associated with driver distraction. Regan, M.

To learn more about how to request items watch this short online video . The following scientific techniques for measuring distraction were identified: on-road and test track studies; driving simulator studies; dual-task studies; eye glance monitoring studies; the visual occlusion method; the peripheral detection task; In Europe, North America and Japan, draft standards have already been developed which contain performance based goals which must be reached by the HMI so that the in-car technologies do not Porter & J.D.

Distraction outside the vehicle was identified as the contributing factor in 29.4 percent of crashes attributable to distraction. get redirected here Clayton, Vic : Monash University, Accident Research Centre MLA Citation Young, Kristie L.and Regan, Michael A.and Hammer, Mike. Regan, Mike Hammer] Monash University, Accident Research Centre Clayton, Vic 2003 Australian/Harvard Citation Young, Kristie L.& Regan, Michael A.& Hammer, Mike. 2003, Driver distraction : a review of the literature / You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

Moreover, research findings suggest that drivers are not always aware of the detrimental effects on their driving performance of engaging in secondary tasks (Lesch & Hancock, 2004) and often underestimate the Mobile phone use also often involves associated tasks that may further distract the driver. Research by Horberry and colleagues (in press), however, failed to reveal any interaction between the complexity of the driving environment and two in-vehicle distracter tasks: operating an in-car entertainment system and http://omsbl.com/driver-distraction/driver-distraction-conference-2017.html INTRODUCTION Despite the complexities of the driving task, it is not unusual to see drivers engaged in various other activities while driving, including talking to passengers and listening to the radio

In contrast, the paper map resulted in the lowest mean speeds, the highest workload ratings and the greatest number of navigational errors. There is currently little knowledge regarding how drivers use in-vehicle technologies: whether they use them in the manner intended by the designer; and at what point (or threshold) and under what In response, a large and rapidly growing body of research has examined the impact of devices, particularly mobile phones, on driving performance (Young, Regan & Hammer, 2003).

Finally, as the complexity of the addition tasks increased, drivers’ perception of workload (recorded using the NASA-TLX), distraction level and perceptions of their driving as being less safe also increased (Harbluk

The time of each collision was determined through driver statements, police records and call records to emergency services. The voice activated system, however, was associated with more frequent glances at a card containing the destination details than the visual-manual entry systems. According to Wickens’ multiple resource theory, if two tasks, performed concurrently, compete for similar cognitive, perceptual or motor resources then dual-task interference occurs (Wickens, 2002). Using a mobile phone while driving can increase the risk of being involved in a collision by up to four times.

Results revealed that drivers in the 25 to 29 year age group had the highest risk of being involved in a fatal or injury crash while using a hand-held phone of Measures of visual scanning behaviour (using eye tracking equipment) vehicle control (e.g., braking and longitudinal deceleration) and drivers’ subjective assessments of workload, safety and distraction were recorded. Distracted driving. my review here In particular, it the focus is on the adaptive strategies drivers adopt when using devices in order to maintain their driving performance at an adequate level, under what conditions these adaptive

Fortunately, we are at an early enough stage in the evolution of the vehicle cockpit to prevent distraction from escalating into a major road safety problem. Driving speed, workload, navigation errors, and reaction time to external events were measured Australasian College of Road Safety 385 Distracted driving while interacting with each system. Close News and Events home MUARC NewsMUARC Events Close Contact us home Close Find a course Choose Monash Research Sub menu Research areas Our publications Participate in our research Early career The visual attention required to dial a hand-held Australasian College of Road Safety 384 Distracted driving mobile phone and tune the radio was also assessed for comparative purposes.

Preoccupation with electronic devices while driving is also becoming increasingly common. The operation of certain on-board and portable technologies, such as mobile phones, often involves associated tasks such as writing down phone numbers and address details on pieces of paper. There are however, a number of situations in which these adaptive behaviours can break down, resulting in a significant degradation in driving performance. In North America, Europe and Japan, driver distraction is a priority issue in road safety.

Stutts et al. (2001) conducted a study for the AAAFTS in which they examined detailed crash records from the Crashworthiness Data System (CDS) collected between 1995 and 1999. Given that driving is primarily a visual-spatial-manual task, then, according to multiple resource theory, tasks that have visual inputs and require a manual response should cause greater dual-task interference and, hence, Biomechanical or physical Australasian College of Road Safety 380 Distracted driving distraction occurs when drivers remove one or both hands from the steering wheel for extended periods of time to physically Simply having a mobile phone in a vehicle was found to be associated with a two-fold increased risk in being involved in a fatal collision.

Research is required to better understand drivers' willingness to engage in potentially distracting tasks while driving, the factors that influence this willingness and under what conditions drivers engage in distracting tasks. Includes material on accident/illness prevention and health promotion strategies.

Top